Saturday 9 July 2016

1. Rediscovering the Works

A few years ago, I came across two works by Bruce Taylor, at a car boot sale in the South of France: a small 'abstract' oil painting and an unusually elongated ceramic dish decorated with a contemporary wax-resist 'camouflage' glaze; quite different from the studio ceramics made in the UK at the time. 
Both works were signed 'Bruce Taylor' and dated 1956. 
Although I did not recognize the name, I realized that I was looking at something special. 
The painting displayed some of the characteristics of British art of the 1950s, but did not look derivative of the work of any known artist I knew:

Bruce Taylor, Ore Stream, 1956. Oil on Massonite.



Bruce Taylor, Dish, earthenware. 1956.


































The shape and the glaze pattern of the dish gave it a biomorphic appearance quite distinct from the work of Bernard Leach who set the ceramic agenda in St Ives.


*   *   *

In 2013, I came across and acquired a third piece by Taylor: an 'abstract' ink drawing (below), signed and dated 1959.   



This was enough to induce me to find out more about the artist .

One year later, the person who had sold me these works informed me that Bruce Taylor was a British artist who had lived in her village, where he had died in 1989. 
Following the death of his third wife, Judy, in 2010, the heirs (nephew and niece of his third wife), who were not interested in either Taylor or his art works, took what they wanted and left the studio content to be sold for a local cancer charity.

When the house was sold, the large plan chest in which Taylor had kept his work on paper — paintings, drawings, prints and photographs — disappeared; probably skipped.

This tragic event makes the remaining works — sculptures, a painting, drawings, ceramics, photographs and a remarkable photomontage —all the more precious; for, alongside works owned by family members, they constitute the only known body of works from which we can get a sense of the variety and quality of his already small oeuvre

Conscious that the remaining works were going to be sold and scattered, and that the artist's name would remain forgotten, I took the decision to acquire all the works that had not been sold, and keep them together; with a view to curating an exhibition, in a public gallery, and see if Taylor could be written back into the history of St Ives and British Modernism.

The first reference to Taylor I came across was about the sale of a sale of one of his sculpture (below)  by the Paisnel Gallery in gallery in London. 
Bruce Taylor, May Bug, Welded steel. 1958.



























A short truncated biographical note on the gallery web site read:

'Born in Yorkshire. He studied at Bath Academy of Art. Taught in Hertfordshire and in the late 50's in Cornwall. He lived in St Ives and worked in welded sculpture. He was a member of the Penwith Society and became chairman in 1957. Exhibited in m…'.

During a visit to the gallery, I was informed me that this sculpture was the only work that the gallery had ever come across by this artist.

David Buckman's dictionary of 'Artists in Britain', published by the Goldmark Gallery (01572821424), available on line at [http://issuu.com/powershift/docs/dictionary_t], the only published source of information about Taylor, seemed to have been the source.

It was used by the Belgrave Gallery, London, who sold the sculpture to the Paisnel Gallery.

It reads:
'Bruce Taylor (1921-) - Sculptor and teacher, born in Yorkshire, who studied at Bath Academy of Art, Corsham. He taught in Hertfordshire, then in Cornwall, living in St Ives. Was a member of the Penwith Society, becoming chairman in 1957. Showed in many mixed exhibitions in Britain and abroad, including 19 Young Sculptors, Hillfield Gardens, Gloucester, 1962,when he was resident at Pitchcombe, Stroud. Had a solo exhibition at Drian Gallery, 1958. Taylor had work in the collections of the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Leicester Education Authority. He was featured in Belgrave Gallery's 1992 show of British abstract art of the 50s and 60s'.

RESEARCH:

In the St Ives archive I was able to study a selection of exhibition catalogues of the Penwith Society exhibitions and compile a list of Taylor's exhibited works.
Via antiquarian booksellers, I also sourced the catalogues of Taylor's only two London exhibitions, at the Drian Gallery and two for his exhibition at Arnolfini, in Bristol (1963 and 1966).

The St Ives Times & Echo, that covered the arts during the period Taylor was in St Ives, provided some complementary information about Taylor's involvement with the Penwith Society, his contributions in organizing exhibitions and interacting with the film crew that came to shoot two documentaries about the arts in St Ives. 






Taylor showing visitors at the Penwith Galley

The minutes of the Penwith Society's meeting — preserved, uncatalogued, in the archives of the Penwith Society — reveal the extent of Taylor's active  participation in the activities of the Society and the issues it had to address.

The last document in the St Ives archive that shows Taylor in St Ives is a photograph of Taylor and Bernard Leach opening an exhibition of children art at the Penwith Society gallery published in The St Ives Times and Echo of 3rd March 1967. By then Taylor had moved to Grantham and must have come back to St Ives especially for this event:  



THE NEXT STEP required finding out how, why and in what circumstances Taylor moved to the South of France.

This required another visit to locate more works, if possible, and to locate and talk with people whohad known him.

This was critical, for an internet search in sale rooms returned the result 'No auction results available for Bruce TAYLOR'. 

During a three months research visit to Pyrénées Orientales, partly funded with an Arts Council, England grant, I met an artist friend of Bruce and Judy Taylor, a British expat sculptress, who knew the Taylors well and provided invaluable background information about Taylor's character, interests, his activities, moves, and how he earned a living making ceramics. 
She did not have works by Taylor to show me, however. 
It would seem that some of the sculptures and ceramic pieces that Taylor displayed in his open air showroom were sold to strangers to the region and there is little hope of tracing them now.
















One large drawing that Taylor kept on the living room wall, but that was given by Judy to a friend, after Taylor's death, re-surfaced, during my visit. I was able to acquire it and have it professionally restored; for it had suffered in the rough environment of the Taylor's rustic home.
Back in England I located two more works by Taylor — two drawings — and learnt about the recent destruction of a plaster sculpture that had been left outside, unprotected from the elements, in the owner's garden. 

Various calls fo information via the local press in St Ives, via on-line resources and magazines about art led me to one of Taylor's daughter from his second mariage and, later, via the blog I compiled, I was contacted by his son from a first mariage.

The fragmentation of Taylor's life has made it more difficult to establish key facts about his life and work, before he decided to become an artist.


1. Rediscovering the Works

Four years ago, I came across two art works, signed 'Bruce Taylor' and dated 1956, at a 'brocante', in the South of France: a small 'abstract' oil painting and an unusual ceramic dish decorated with a contemporary wax-resist 'camouflage' glaze; quite different from the studio ceramics made in the UK at the time. 

Both works displayed some characteristics of British art from the 1950s, but did not look derivative of the work of any artist I knew:

Bruce Taylor, Ore Stream, 1956. Oil on Massonite.



Bruce Taylor, Dish, earthenware. 1956.



































The shape and the glaze pattern of the dish gave it a biomorphic appearance quite distinct from the Asia-inspired forms of Bernard Leach's works, who set the ceramic agenda in St Ives and beyond.


*   *   *
In 2013, I came across and acquired a third piece by Taylor: an 'abstract' ink drawing (below), signed and dated 1959.   




The person who was selling it informed me that Bruce Taylor was a British artist who had lived in her village, where he had died in 1989. 
Following the death of his third wife, in 2010, the heirs (the nephew and niece of his third wife), who were not interested in Taylor's works, took what they wanted and left the studio content to be sold for a local cancer charity.

When the house was sold, the large plan chest in which Taylor had kept his work on paper — paintings, drawings, prints and photographs — disappeared; probably skipped.

The large Constructivist relief scupture that stood on the facade of the house was taken down by the new owner during building work, but has not been re-instated. 
Two more sculpture remains in the village, in public ownership. One, that can be identified as Eclipse 2 (1966); the other, Thunderstick (1965). Both were included in his solo show at Arnolfini, in 1966. Both were bequeathed to the village by his third wife, in memory of the artist. 

Mistaken for a cross, Thunderstick has since been permanently fitted in the vilage church.  It is ironical that the work of an agnostic should now feature as a religious symbol in a church, as a result of a naive misappropriation. THe chances of re-appropriating it, however, are very slight.

The tragic loss of the plan chest makes the few works that have survived — sculptures, a painting, drawings, ceramics, photographs and a remarkable photomontage —all the more important as representative of the artist's concerns and of his discrete approach to Modernism, more closely related to the art produced on the Cotinent than in America. Taylor's drawings, in particular, show an affinity with Tachisme, that he was made aware of by publication and by a lecture given by Herbert Read to the members of the Penwith Society. Taylor combined an interest in Tachisme with a refusal of the dualism 'Abstraction-Figuration' in absolute terms, inherited from claims made by some American artists and critics, arging that art could be 'non-referential'. 
Taylor seems to have shared Elaine De Kooning's view that ''The exclusion or inclusion of nature is, however, not a matter of the individual artist's choice. For art, nature is unavoidable'.

Alongside a few works owned by family members, the works retrieved from his studio constitute a coherent body of works representative of the quality and variety of his life work

Aware that these works were going to be scattered on the market, and forever separated, I acquired them, with the intention to exhume the artist's career and write it back into the history of St Ives and of British Modernism.

The web revealed that a sculpture by Taylor had been sold by the Paisnel Gallery in London, who had acquired it from the Belgrave Gallery: 
Bruce Taylor, May Bug, Welded steel. 1958.



























A short truncated biographical note on the gallery web site read:

'Born in Yorkshire. He studied at Bath Academy of Art. Taught in Hertfordshire and in the late 50's in Cornwall. He lived in St Ives and worked in welded sculpture. He was a member of the Penwith Society and became chairman in 1957. Exhibited in m…'.

During a visit to the gallery, I was informed that this sculpture was the only work that the gallery had ever come across by this artist.

David Buckman's dictionary of 'Artists in Britain', published by the Goldmark Gallery (01572821424), available on line at [http://issuu.com/powershift/docs/dictionary_t], the only published source of information about Taylor, seemed to have been the source.

It was used by the Belgrave Gallery, London, in the catalogue of their exhibitionin which Taylor's sculpture May bug was sold to the Paisnel Gallery.

It reads:
'Bruce Taylor (1921-) - Sculptor and teacher, born in Yorkshire, who studied at Bath Academy of Art, Corsham. He taught in Hertfordshire, then in Cornwall, living in St Ives. Was a member of the Penwith Society, becoming chairman in 1957. Showed in many mixed exhibitions in Britain and abroad, including 19 Young Sculptors, Hillfield Gardens, Gloucester, 1962,when he was resident at Pitchcombe, Stroud. Had a solo exhibition at Drian Gallery, 1958. Taylor had work in the collections of the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Leicester Education Authority. He was featured in Belgrave Gallery's 1992 show of British abstract art of the 50s and 60s'.

This confirmed that Taylor's art was worth investigating.

RESEARCH:
In the St Ives archive I started compiling a list of works exhibited by Taylor, from the  exhibition catalogues of the Penwith Society of Art.
Other exhibition catalogues obtained from antiquarian book-sellers, or consulted  in public libraries revealed that Taylor had exhibited 
twice at the Drian Gallery, London, in 1958 (a group and a solo show),
a sculpture in 1962 at the Artist International Association, London; 
four works at 'Sculpture Today': Midland Group Gallery, Nottingham: 18.8-8.9.62
Counter Thrust, Bronze (£195)
Moonstone, Bronze (£48)
Sea Foam, Drawing (£21),
Seventh Samurai, Drawing (£21)
and twice at Arnolfini, in Bristol (1963: group show and 1966: solo show). 

The St Ives Times & Echo, that covered the arts provided some useful information about Taylor's involvement in the activities of the Penwith Society, his involvement in organizing exhibitions and his role in presenting the St Ives artistic scene for two BBC documentaries about the arts in St Ives. 




Taylor showing visitors at the Penwith Galley

The minutes of the Penwith Society's meeting — preserved in the archives of the Penwith Society — reveal the extent of Taylor's active participation in the activities of the Society and the issues it had to address.

The last document in the St Ives archive that shows Taylor in St Ives is a photograph showing him alongside Bernard Leach at the opening of an exhibition of children art at the Penwith Society gallery. It was published in The St Ives Times and Echo of 3rd March 1967. By then, Taylor had moved to Grantham, LIncolnshire, and must have travelled down to St Ives especially for this event:  


THE NEXT STEP required finding out how, why and in what circumstances Taylor left a promising career as an artist and moved to the South of France to start a new life.

This required locating works and people who had known him.

This was critical, for an internet search for auction sales returned the result 'No auction results available for Bruce TAYLOR'. 

In 2015, during a three months research visit to Pyrénées Orientales, funded by Arts Council, England, I met an artist friend of Bruce and Judy Taylor, who provided invaluable background information about Taylor's work, his ideas, his character and how he earned a living by making ceramics. 
Pat Rowland nor any of her friends, had any works by Taylor, however. 
It would seem that some of the sculptures and ceramic pieces that Taylor had displayed in his open air showroom, and that can be seen on photographs, were sold and scattered across Europe, with little hope of ever been traced.



















During that visit I sourced, and acquired a large drawing, exhibited at Arnolfini, in 1963; that Taylor kept on his living room wall, and was given by his wife to a friend, after Taylor's death. The drawing miraculously re-surfaced, during my visit, and I was able to buy it and have it professionally restored.
Back in England, I located two more works by Taylor — two drawings — and learnt about the recent destruction of a plaster sculpture that had been left outside, unprotected from the elements, in the owner's garden. 

Various calls fo information via the local press in St Ives, via on-line resources and art magazines put me in contact with pupils whom he taught, with one of Taylor's daughter from his second mariage and, later, via the blog I compiled, with his son from a first mariage.

The fragmentation of Taylor's life had led him to live three separate — partitionned — lives, in different locations, quite separate from eachother. This made it more difficult to establish key facts about his life and work before he decided to study art and become an artist, and after he parted company with the British art scene to attempt a new life experiment abroad.




2. Presenting the Work

Most of the works in this exhibition come from Taylor's studio, in Taulis.
They were acquired at a sale for a cancer charity, after the death of the artist's third wife and heir, Judy.

These works were of special significance to the artist. He took them to France, when he moved there, in 1968, and kept them all his life; displaying them in his successive homes, like talismans of his artistic life in St Ives.


From left to right: Thunderstick, Warrior II, Sentinel photographed at Mas de Fourtou.
Given the comparatively short period in which they were made (1956-65), in St Ives, they have the quality of a 'time capsule'.

Three early silk-screen prints have been lent by family members. 
Since Taylor's paintings and drawings seems to have been skipped after the death of his third wife, these prints enable us to get a fuller measure of his Tachiste experiments around 1957-8, in conjunction with the testimony of one of his students. 
A sculpture from his first solo show in London, 'May-bug', originally bought by the Belgrave Gallery, is loaned by a private collector.

Since there is no record of works by Taylor ever sold at auction we have to conclude that the works that he sold, either privately or through exhibitions, during his lifetime, are  still in private hands: in the UK, France and elsewhere. They will no doubt re-surface as Taylor's name and reputation rise.

A close examination of exhibition catalogues suggests that Taylor produced a small oeuvre. His conviction that 'the act of making the image is more important than the object created', combined with the the fact that he did not have a permanent contract with a gallery, and earned his living as a teacher, enabled him to produce experimental works and avoid commercial duplication. This explain both the variety and the small number of works he produced.


*  *  *
Curatorial Concept:

The exhibition will present Taylor's work alongside a selection of works by European artists — Pignon, Picasso, Miro, Bryen, Rebeyrolle, Riopelle, Hartung, Wols and others — who rejected the dualism 'Figuration. Abstraction', promoted by American critics like Rosenberg and Greenberg in their attempt to claim the superiority of the American avant-garde over the 'School of Paris'. 
The issue centered around whether Art should emancipate itself from nature and operate by relinquishing any reference to it. Thus emerged the notion that art could be 'non figurative', 'non-referential' or even 'self-referential'.
The epistemologocal absurdity of such claims was not apparent to everyone, and gained increasing ascendency in artistic circles in Britain, where it has become dogma to this day.


It is all the more surprising since Mondrian, in his essay Plastic Art and Pure Plastic Art, had noted that the distinction between 'figurative' and 'non figurative' art was 'approximate' and 'relative'; pointing out that 'every form, even every line, represents a figure, no form is absolutely neutral' (reprinted in Circle, p. 42).

In 1955 (date of the first Documenta), in response to the claims made by American artists and critics that the most advanced contemporary art was 'non-referential', Elaine de Kooning remarked:''The exclusion or inclusion of nature is, however, not a matter of the individual artist's choice. For art, nature is unavoidable'.

Mark Tobey— presented in 1958 (two years after the Tate Gallery exhibition of American painting) by Patrick Heron, as the 'forerunner of Pollock' — remarked: 'Pure abstraction for me would be  a painting where one finds no correspondance to life — an impossibility for me.'  (history link.org)

This, however, did not prevent the claim that Abstract Art — whether geometric or gestural — was a superior, more 'pure', form of art  to spread and take hold of the British Art Establishment, before Pop Art and Nouveau Realisme made Figuration the new avant-garde.

In the wake of Greenberg and Rosenberg, a
rt historians and critics have emphasized and promoted non-referentiality as the basis of Abstract Art, instead of examining how Figurative and Abstract Art implements diverse and comple forms of reference to the world; along an infinitely varied continuum.

Taylor's fascination for life forms and his resolutely pacifist views, developed during his war experience (and the sight of a concentration camp), meant that his art remained resolutely associated with the world, nature and history; albeit in non-literal or illustrative ways. This, however, did not prevent him from experimenting with form and structure

==========

Taylor's work shows affinities and seems to have converged with experiments carried out in Europe rather than have been directly influenced by them. The continuum that enabled artist to develop different modes of reference requires that we situate Taylor in relation to the work of other St Ives artists, and at the same time in the context of European art. 
The exhibition will present his work in dialogue with the work of other European artists with whom he shared some affinities.
At a time when British art was too readily accepting the dualism emphasised by American artists and critics, between Figuration and Abstraction, Taylor challenged this dualism and produced work that transcended it: situating himself in a zone across which operated as diverse artists as Picasso, Edouard Pignon, Jean Atlan, Camille Bryen, Wols, Miro, Rebeyrolle, Mark Tobey and others.     

3 Sketch for groupings.

Sequence 1 (from left to right):

Maillol, Nude, lithograph
Jacques Lipchitz, Sauvetage, lithograph
Giacometti, Standing Figure. Phototype.

Bruce Taylor, Warrior II, Bronze.

This sequence situates Taylor's treatment of the human figure as independent from the sculptural practice of Rodin, Maillol, Epstein, Lipchitz, Moore, etc. that were grounded in drawing from the nude.
Taylor's figure, by contrast, crystallize a human presence through a conceptual synthesis of three abstract but significant elements: standing up, anchored/grounded into space, looking ahead. 
Taylor's figure takes on a totemic form first developed by Giacometti, and later by William Turnbull, Lyn Chadwick and others.

3.